The Need to Punish
The Political Consequences of Identifying with the Aggressor
By Arno Gruen
Translated from the original German by Hildegarde and Hunter Hannum.
Presented at Martti Siirala's 80th Birthday Seminar, 30th November 2002, Helsinki,
Finlandia Hall
This paper is based on, "Der Fremde in uns" (The stranger within us), published by
Klett-Cotta (Stuttgart), which received the "Geschwister-Scholl-Preis" in 2001.) It
also appeared in slightly different form in The Journal of Psychohistory, Vol 27, No.
2, Fall 1999.
READ ARTICLE IN PDF FORMAT
We live in a world in which we are becoming
increasingly dependent on one another and yet at the same time are
turning more and more against one another. Why are people hostile to
what connects them, to what they have in common - their humanity?
Milovan Djilas, Tito's comrade in the partisan war against the Nazis
and later one of his most severe critics, describes in his
autobiographical report, Land Without
Justice, the cruelty of a male world in
which humaneness is scorned as weakness. Once after the war a
Montenegrin Yugoslav named Sekula met a Turkish Moslem on the road
from Bijelo Polje to Mojkovac:
"They had never seen or heard of each other before. That
particular road was always dangerous, thickly wooded, and perfect for
ambushes. The Moslem was happy that he was in the company of a
Montenegrin. Sekula, too, felt more secure being with a Turk, just in
case Turkish guerrillas should be around. The Moslem was obviously a
peace loving family man. On the way they offered one another tobacco
and chatted in friendly fashion. Travelling together through the
wild, the men grew close to one another. Sekula later declared that
he felt no hatred, no hatred whatever for this man. The fellow would
have been just like anyone else, said Sekula, if he had not been a
Turk. This inability to feel hatred made him feel guilty. And yet, as
he said, Turks are people too."
"It was a summer day, and the heat was overpowering. However,
because the whole region was covered by a thick forest and the road
skirted a little stream, it was cool and pleasant. The two travellers
sat, finally, to have a bite to eat and to rest in the fresh coolness
by the brook. Sekula boasted to the Moslem of what a fine pistol he
had, and showed it to him. The Moslem looked at it, praised the
weapon, and asked Sekula if it was loaded. Sekula replied that it was
- and at that moment it occurred to him that he could kill the Turk
simply by moving a finger. Still, he had made no firm resolve to do
this. He pointed the pistol at the Moslem, straight between his eyes,
and said, "Yes, it is loaded, and I could kill you now."
Blinking before the muzzle and laughing, the Moslem begged Sekula to
turn the gun away, because it could go off. Sekuja realized quite
clearly, in a flash, that he must kill his fellow traveller. He
simply would not be able to bear the shame and the pangs of
conscience if he let this Turk go now. And he fired, as though by
accident, between the smiling eyes of that man."
When Sekula told the story later, he claimed that
at the moment when he jokingly aimed the pistol at the Moslem's
forehead he had no intention of killing him. Djilas writes: "And
then, his finger seemed to pull by itself something erupted inside,
something with which he was born and which he was utterly incapable
of holding back." That must have been the moment when Sekula
felt so close to the Turk that he was overcome with shame. As absurd
as it sounds, he did what he did not out of hatred but its opposite:
he killed this "stranger" because he could not
hate him. This made him feel ashamed and guilty because the
friendliness and good will he sensed in himself turned into a feeling
of weakness. It was this feeling he had to kill. When he killed "the
Other," he killed humanity in himself
Klaus Barbie, the Gestapo "butcher of Lyon" who tortured a
French resistance fighter to death, said in an interview with Neal
Ascherson (1983): "As I interrogated Jean Moulin, I felt that he
was myself" In other words, what the butcher did to his victim
he did in a certain sense to himself. My point is this: hatred of the
foreigner always has something to do with self hatred. If we want to
understand why people torment and humiliate others, we must first
deal with what we despise in ourselves, for the enemy we believe we
see in the other person must originally exist inside. We want to
silence this part of us by destroying the stranger who, because he
resembles us, reminds us of it. That is the only way we can distance
ourselves from what has become foreign to us in ourselves. That is
the only way we can maintain our self-esteem and feel as if we are
holding our heads high.